[jboss-user] [JCA Development] New message: "Re: JBJCA-201 - Standalone configuration"

Jesper Pedersen do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Jan 19 14:01:36 EST 2010

User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "JBJCA-201 - Standalone configuration":


Author  : Jesper Pedersen
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen

Currently we are using

as the holder class for the object that needs to be validated.
Probably a better option would be to create a

object, since we shouldn't require an instance of the object that needs to be checked.The class looks like ValidateObject, but have
Class<?> target

instead of
Object target


The ValidateObject class should then be removed.
This is especially useful for the standalone configuration as we don't have to create the object instances, but just pass the class definition.
The Main class for the standalone configuration should take a single argument -- path to the .RAR archive -- then convert that into an java.net.URL and pass that to the

This means that the validator will have to use a lot of the same constructs as the deployer chain. The common functionality should be extracted into classes living in .deployers.common. This change will of course require changes to the current deployer chain.


To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/520909#520909

More information about the jboss-user mailing list