[jboss-user] [JBoss Remoting Development] New message: "Re: Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?"

Ron Sigal do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Mar 16 10:48:23 EDT 2010

User development,

A new message was posted in the thread "Remoting 3: "groupName" -> "instanceName"?":


Author  : Ron Sigal
Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ron.sigal@jboss.com

No objections.
So, service type and group (instance) name are analogous to interface and implementation, I guess, so the name could be derived from that analogy, as well.  But "instanceName" seems OK, too.


To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/532302#532302

More information about the jboss-user mailing list