[jboss-user] [jBPM] - jBPM- Transaction isolation level
Maurice de Chateau
do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu May 6 10:41:01 EDT 2010
Maurice de Chateau [http://community.jboss.org/people/MohReece] replied to the discussion
"jBPM- Transaction isolation level"
To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/541577#541577
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Alexander,
You're not mentioning which version of jBPM you're using, but in the user guide for version 3.2.x ( http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3.2/userguide/html/persistence.html#isolationlevelofthejdbcconnection http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3.2/userguide/html/persistence.html#isolationlevelofthejdbcconnection) you can read the following:
"+Make sure that the database isolation level that you configure for your JDBC connection is at least READ_COMMITTED.+
+Almost all features run OK even with READ_UNCOMMITTED (isolation level 0 and the only isolation level supported by HSQLDB). But race conditions might occur in the job executor and with synchronizing multiple tokens.+"
So that's quite clear in itself. But if you want a little more background, you can read this JIRA issue ( *https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-983 JBPM-983*), in which Tom Baeyens explains about the underlying reasoning for this persistence aspect.
Regards,
Maurice
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[http://community.jboss.org/message/541577#541577]
Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&containerType=14&container=2034]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20100506/29155283/attachment.html
More information about the jboss-user
mailing list