[jboss-user] [jBPM Development] - SubProcess signaling issue

Maciej Swiderski do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu May 27 02:13:40 EDT 2010

Maciej Swiderski [http://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] replied to the discussion

"SubProcess signaling issue"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/544997#544997

Hi HuiSheng,

thanks for your comment.

I would go for option 1 (in fact has already tested that and it seems to work properly for signaling). Another thing is to keep the approuch consistent since we expose main process instance as Execution I would say we shall give same type for sub process instance.

Another question was about securing SubProcessActivity to do not signal it while sub process is still active. I did a small fix that throws an exception when user tries to signal sub process while it is not finished. Do you think it is right way to do?


Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in jBPM Development at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20100527/be11198b/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list