[jboss-user] [jBPM] - Re: Signal a wait state and suspend related running subprocesses

Michael Wohlfart do-not-reply at jboss.com
Wed Sep 29 07:19:03 EDT 2010

Michael Wohlfart [http://community.jboss.org/people/mwohlf] created the discussion

"Re: Signal a wait state and suspend related running subprocesses"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/563851#563851

Hi Stefano,

this is from the userguide:
> If an execution is locked, methods that change the execution will      throw a PvmException and the message will reference the actual locking state. [...]
> An execution implementation will be locked: 
> * When it is ended
> * When it is suspended
> * During asynchronous continuations
The behaviour you describe seems to be intended.

Maybe what you can try to model your usecase is not suspend the process instance or it's sub processes but move to a wait state with an escalation trigger that will fire when the "suspend" time is over. This way the process is not locked.

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20100929/a16d53fb/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list