[jboss-user] [EJB3] - Re: EJB3 Session Bean Pool

Carlo de Wolf do-not-reply at jboss.com
Tue Apr 5 04:50:26 EDT 2011

Carlo de Wolf [http://community.jboss.org/people/wolfc] created the discussion

"Re: EJB3 Session Bean Pool"

To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/597769#597769

For the benefit of other people new to this thread, you can only use ThreadlocalPool if the threads are backed by a pool. Spawning new / infinite threads will lead to new / infinite instances. ( http://community.jboss.org/message/589434#589434 http://community.jboss.org/message/589434#589434)

The StrictMaxPool is designed to hold a maximum amount of instances. It does not care about concurrency or retention.
I think it should be possible to extend StrictMaxPool and set the strictMaxSize semaphore higher than the maxSize. e.g. strictMaxSize = 200, maxSize = 50. That should allow for 200 concurrent requests, while the pool will size down to 50 during low load.

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in EJB3 at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20110405/eb81b068/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list