[jboss-user] [jBPM] - Re: Difficult workflow question

Maciej Swiderski do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu Apr 26 02:35:05 EDT 2012

Maciej Swiderski [https://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] created the discussion

"Re: Difficult workflow question"

To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/732306#732306

Josh, in case we discussed sub process (or task) should not be terminated by end event but should be canceled (interrupted) by boundary event attached to it. As you can see, there are multiple instances of the sub process and if one of them completes with expected result it should throw a signal informing other sub process instances to interrupt their processing but this particular instance will be completed after event is thrown so no need to terminate itself. Does that make sense?

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20120426/e3360678/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list