[jboss-user] [jBPM] - Re: Using jBPM as state machine engine - is it a good idea?

Maciej Swiderski do-not-reply at jboss.com
Mon Nov 26 06:29:34 EST 2012

Maciej Swiderski [https://community.jboss.org/people/swiderski.maciej] created the discussion

"Re: Using jBPM as state machine engine - is it a good idea?"

To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/778314#778314

Not sure if I understood concept of "custom persistence module" correctly, if you could elaborate bit more on this would be great.

In general you would need to combine jbpm tables and your data base model so both will have correct persistent store available for its data. Every change of the record would need to signal corresponding process instance to (re)evaluate rules and take appropriate action to move process to another activity/state.


Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20121126/20702e73/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list