[jboss-user] [JNDI and Naming] - Re: Use plain @EJB for remote EJB lookup?

jaikiran pai do-not-reply at jboss.com
Thu May 30 08:45:32 EDT 2013

jaikiran pai [https://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran] created the discussion

"Re: Use plain @EJB for remote EJB lookup?"

To view the discussion, visit: https://community.jboss.org/message/820396#820396

> Mikal Henriksen wrote:
> But your answer made me realize that we also need to know the name for the implementing class, since that's part of every standard jndi name. Thinking about it, it seems weird that the client should have to know about the name of the server-side class implementing the interface (the exception is of course multiple implementations of the same interface). 
You don't need to know the class name of the implementing bean class. That's just a default that gets used. i.e. the bean name defaults to the simple class name of the implementing class. It can always be overriden using the +name+ attribute of the appropriate annotation (@Stateless, @Stateful, @Singleton) or via the +ejb-name+ element of ejb-jar.xml.

Reply to this message by going to Community

Start a new discussion in JNDI and Naming at Community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-user/attachments/20130530/1ac0cfaa/attachment.html 

More information about the jboss-user mailing list