[jbosscache-dev] RE: Integrating streaming state transfer - design brainstorming

[Bela Ban]

JBC will be in JBoss AS 5. So, yes, integrating SST is essential, 
whereas we can leave PST and breaking the locks for 2.1. Breaking the 
locks will require some good amount of thought, so I suggest we get to 
it soon after your changes to 2.0 are done

Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
> We have FLUSH already in place. I agree with your proposal to include
> SST for 2.0.0 and to leave partial state transfer and locks for 2.1.0.
> It might be too late to squeeze everything in 2.0.0. 
>
> However, I am not sure how it affects Jboss 5.0 timeline? 
>
> Bela?
>
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik at jboss.org] 
>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:01 PM
>> To: Vladimir Blagojevic
>> Cc: Brian Stansberry; jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Subject: Re: Integrating streaming state transfer - design 
>> brainstorming
>>
>> The two issues below require FLUSH, am I right?
>>
>> Can things not be phased in - just SST for now (2.0.0), and 
>> partial state transfer and breaking of locks for 2.1.0?
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>>
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
>> Email: manik at jboss.org
>> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
>> MSN: manik at surtani.org
>> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>>
>>
>> On 17 Aug 2006, at 16:18, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> I already did ask him about integration of streaming state transfer 
>>> but I did not for this other stuff. I think I better talk 
>>>       
>> to him first 
>>     
>>> about everything. Lets postpone our conference call to 
>>>       
>> after I talk to 
>>     
>>> Manik.
>>>
>>> Manik,
>>>
>>> I am unsure how to procede with integration of streaming state 
>>> transfer since it also affects partial state transfer, 
>>>       
>> activation etc 
>>     
>>> etc. See Jira issue below.
>>>
>>> Let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>       
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Brian Stansberry
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:09 AM
>>>> To: Vladimir Blagojevic
>>>> Subject: RE: Integrating streaming state transfer - design 
>>>> brainstorming
>>>>
>>>> OK, but please try to ping Manik first re: what release it 
>>>>         
>> goes in.  
>>     
>>>> That's up to you two.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I have sufficient understanding of how streaming
>>>>>           
>>>> needs to be
>>>>         
>>>>> integrated. I see how activation is using rpc calls to do partial 
>>>>> state transfer and how this needs to be upgraded to partial
>>>>>           
>>>> streaming
>>>>         
>>>>> transfers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of these tasks that are assigned to me are marked for
>>>>> 2.1 version. I admit I am a bit confused how to proceed.
>>>>>
>>>>> So how's today afternoon for a talk? Maybe 3 pm EST? Or any
>>>>>           
>>>> other time
>>>>         
>>>>> that suits you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-591
>>>>> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-315
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>> Brian Stansberry
>>>> Lead, AS Clustering
>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>> Ph: 510-396-3864
>>>> skype: bstansberry
>>>>         
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
>   

-- 
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group
JBoss - a division of Red Hat