[jbosscache-dev] RE: Thoughts on JBCACHE-794?

Ben Wang ben.wang at jboss.com
Fri Oct 27 08:53:36 EDT 2006


I think the forum is fine as is (that is the reason I didn't add anything to it earlier). 

-----Original Message-----
From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik at jboss.org] 
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:36 PM
To: Ben Wang
Cc: jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on JBCACHE-794?

Could you pls update the forum accordingly.

Thanks,
--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

Email: manik at jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik at surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani


On 27 Oct 2006, at 12:57, Ben Wang wrote:

> Please go ahead. I don't see any adverse effect so far.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Ben
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manik Surtani [mailto:manik at jboss.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 7:27 PM
> To: Ben Wang
> Cc: jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Thoughts on JBCACHE-794?
>
> Hey Ben,
>
> Any thoughts on this issue?
>
> 	http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3979697
>
> Do you (or anyone else) see any adverse effects that could arise by  
> setting the lock acquisition timeout on the eviction thread to 0?   
> It would remove the chance of this deadlock occuring, plus improve 
> performance in general as evictions will happen in a more timely 
> fashion.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> Email: manik at jboss.org
> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
> MSN: manik at surtani.org
> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>
>





More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list