[jbosscache-dev] Re: 1.4.0.SP2 or 1.4.1?

[Galder Zamarreno]

Tbh, I think I've only seen it in being asked in one case. I don't think it's top priority.

Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat


-----Original Message-----
From: jbosscache-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbosscache-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Manik Surtani
Sent: 27 October 2006 13:34
To: jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
Subject: [jbosscache-dev] Re: 1.4.0.SP2 or 1.4.1?

Also,

JBCACHE-684 has been made in HEAD - any thoughts on whether this  
should be backported to 1.4.x?  It is easy enough, and I have seen  
people hit this hard limit in eviction queues often enough in support  
cases.  Galder, thoughts?  Is this something a lot of customers would  
find helpful in a 1.4 release?

Cheers,
--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

Email: manik at jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik at surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani


On 27 Oct 2006, at 12:31, Manik Surtani wrote:

> Brian and I have been speaking about adding JBCACHE-812 to the next  
> 1.4.x release, the purpose being that there may be an AS 4.2.0  
> release which may allow us to include the MUX.
>
> Since this is a fairly large feature change, I feel it is beyond  
> the scope of an SP and would warrant a bump up in version numbers.   
> And TBH, so does JBCACHE-756, since it involves a new JBoss  
> Serialization jar.
>
> Thoughts on this?  Pls respond soon as I hope to cut the next 1.4  
> release next week.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
> Email: manik at jboss.org
> Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
> MSN: manik at surtani.org
> Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
>
>

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev