JDBCCacheLoader? Was: [jbosscache-dev] Re: JDBCClassLoader bug

[Manik Surtani]

So without the root element you're not going to be able to persist  
any data stored directly in the root node (if anyone ever does this!)

Is the new impl in any way compatible with the existing  
JDBCCacheLoader anyway?  I thought their storage formats were different.


--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

Email: manik at jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik at surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani



On 1 Feb 2007, at 03:49, Mircea Markus wrote:

> In order to make new implementation 'backward' compatible (i.e. to  
> work on existing data managed by JDBCacheLoader) I need root to be  
> persisted - implementation heavily relies on that.
> My thought is to check at startup whether it exists, and create it.  
> Any cons/alternatives?
>
> Cheers,
> Mircea
>
> On 2/1/07, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> loader.put(any_fqn);
> assertTrue(loader.exists(Fqn.ROOT)); //fails
>
> The problem is that root element is not persisted.
>
> Cheers,
> Mircea
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosscache-dev/attachments/20070201/efda74c6/attachment.html