[jbosscache-dev] Let's make 3.0 backwards compatible

Bela Ban bela at jboss.com
Tue Aug 19 23:28:15 EDT 2008


I added an item to our agenda for Brno, so we can discuss it there (on 
FRI, but this will get shifted around anyway)

Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> This is one of the main things I want to talk about when we have 
>>>> our AS meeting in Neuchatel the week before the Brno meeting. The 
>>>> AS needs a general solution to this problem.
>>>
>>> Jarjar.  :-)  I really think it would work.  It would make upgrading 
>>> individual jars hard and may bloat the overall download size a bit, 
>>> bit it nicely isolates things such that different subsystems may be 
>>> tied to different versions of dependent libraries.  Actually, 
>>> upgrading needn't be that hard - e.g., all clustering code could be 
>>> encapsulated in a single jboss-as-clustering-5.0.jar which includes 
>>> jarjar'd versions of JBC, JGroups, other deps, as well as AS 
>>> Clustering classes.  Upgrading could involve a new 
>>> jboss-as-clustering-5.1.jar which may include a new release of JBC, 
>>> etc., without affecting other JBC users, whether they be end user 
>>> apps or other subsystems.
>>>
>>
>> We'll discuss this in Neuchatel.  This kind of thing requires buy-in 
>> from several projects, e.g. the hibernate integration is part of 
>> Hibernate; the SFSB integration is part of EJB3. Both of which are 
>> meant to work outside the AS (Hibernate for sure; EJB3 in 
>> as-yet-unrealized theory.)
>>
>
> In the meantime, I think what we can do to solve the 4.2 issue, is to 
> provide the community with an ant task that would use jarjar to create 
> a fully isolated jar for jboss cache and all of its dependencies.
>

-- 
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat




More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list