[jbosscache-dev] Let's make 3.0 backwards compatible
Bela Ban
bela at jboss.com
Tue Aug 19 23:28:15 EDT 2008
I added an item to our agenda for Brno, so we can discuss it there (on
FRI, but this will get shifted around anyway)
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> This is one of the main things I want to talk about when we have
>>>> our AS meeting in Neuchatel the week before the Brno meeting. The
>>>> AS needs a general solution to this problem.
>>>
>>> Jarjar. :-) I really think it would work. It would make upgrading
>>> individual jars hard and may bloat the overall download size a bit,
>>> bit it nicely isolates things such that different subsystems may be
>>> tied to different versions of dependent libraries. Actually,
>>> upgrading needn't be that hard - e.g., all clustering code could be
>>> encapsulated in a single jboss-as-clustering-5.0.jar which includes
>>> jarjar'd versions of JBC, JGroups, other deps, as well as AS
>>> Clustering classes. Upgrading could involve a new
>>> jboss-as-clustering-5.1.jar which may include a new release of JBC,
>>> etc., without affecting other JBC users, whether they be end user
>>> apps or other subsystems.
>>>
>>
>> We'll discuss this in Neuchatel. This kind of thing requires buy-in
>> from several projects, e.g. the hibernate integration is part of
>> Hibernate; the SFSB integration is part of EJB3. Both of which are
>> meant to work outside the AS (Hibernate for sure; EJB3 in
>> as-yet-unrealized theory.)
>>
>
> In the meantime, I think what we can do to solve the 4.2 issue, is to
> provide the community with an ant task that would use jarjar to create
> a fully isolated jar for jboss cache and all of its dependencies.
>
--
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat
More information about the jbosscache-dev
mailing list