[jbosscache-dev] JBoss Cache 2.2.0

Manik Surtani manik at jboss.org
Tue Mar 18 12:45:46 EDT 2008


Is array interception critical for AS 5? I'm guessing no, otherwise it  
would have been in the 2.1.0 feature list.  :-)

On 18 Mar 2008, at 15:34, Jason T. Greene wrote:
> My number one goal for 2.2 is array interception, and a few minor  
> enhancements. The array interception code is in place, most of my  
> work will be on fixing javassist and AOP, so we will need to do a  
> dependency change for 2.2 as well.
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Guys,
>> What do you think should be in 2.2.0, and what should be in 3.x?   
>> Not just for Core, but POJO as well?
>> I think that 2.2.0 should be a very quick release, my target for GA  
>> being mid-May or so, so we can get back on to 3.x tasks (some of  
>> which, like MVCC, I will be doing in parallel to 2.2.0 tasks).
>> Brian, does this make sense, since the main goal of 2.2.0 is, apart  
>> from some more refactoring and a few features, to be rock-solid for  
>> AS 5 (given the way AS 5 deadlines are moving).  With GA targeted  
>> for mid-May, I would think the first betas would start coming out  
>> in 2 - 3 weeks?
>> Main tasks for core cache:
>> - bug fixes reported on 2.1.0, inc. JBCACHE-1170, JBCACHE-1190,  
>> JBCACHE-1258
>> - new features, inc. JBCACHE-789, JBCACHE-1262, JBCACHE-1273
>> - optimisations/refactoring, inc. JBCACHE-890, JBCACHE-611,  
>> JBCACHE-1222, JBCACHE-1239,
>> Jason, what are your thoughts for POJO Cache?
>> Cheers
>> Manik
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik at jboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
>
> -- 
> Jason T. Greene
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat

--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik at jboss.org









More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list