[jbosscache-dev] Pulling the FileCacheLoader from 3.0.0
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 17:15:41 EDT 2008
Manik Surtani wrote:
>
> On 27 Mar 2008, at 20:17, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> What do you guys think? Too many people try and use this in
>>> production and then complain that it doesn't work. It is not
>>> transactional and cannot withstand a JVM crash midway during a write.
>>> Should we deprecate this in 2.2.0 and remove it in 3.0.0?
>>> I know that JBoss AS uses it in some cases, but can that not be
>>> changed to use the JDBM cache loader?
>>
>> No, it can't. :( Unfortunately, JDBM appears to be a pretty dead project.
>
> "Mature", as some may call it. :-) I was just having a conversation
> with the JDBM lead the other day - it's certainly not abandoned or
> anything.
>
Well, that's good. The last release was 1.0 in Aug 2005.
Passivating sessions is a pretty important use case. With FCL, warts
and all, I know where the pain points are (and they aren't as bad, since
passivation isn't transactional).
>> FCL is just an impl of a pluggable interface though. If you don't want
>> it in 3.0 and if we can't find a valid replacement by the time AS is
>> ready to consume 3.0, then I can always pull the FCL code into the
>> AS/EJB3 source tree.
>
> That is always an option, I guess. Shall we stick with deprecating it
> in 2.2 and removing it in 3.0 then?
>
OK by me. Posting on the user forum about it is probably not a bad idea
though.
> Cheers
> --
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik at jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
More information about the jbosscache-dev
mailing list