[jbosscache-dev] Lets ditch docbook (long-term)
Jason T. Greene
jason.greene at redhat.com
Thu May 1 13:13:34 EDT 2008
Manik Surtani wrote:
> +1 on ditching docbook, +1 on Maven being a POS, and +1 on moving to a
> wiki for docs. :-)
>
> The only issues with wikis as official docs are:
>
> 1. Versioning, since documentation has to go hand in hand with releases
I think the ideal solution for versioning would be to have a doc for
every major version (1.x, 2.x, 3.x etc), instead of all versions like we
have now. For features that are added in minor versions, we can just add
a little ("new in 2.2" note).
> 2. Controlling content - it can't be an open "community" wiki. We
> already have that, and that is useful, but an official guide should be
> restricted to committers.
Thats a good point. I think a good compromise on this is allow
community annotations, similar to the PHP and MySQL documentation. We
could also grant access to trustworthy contributors that may not commit
source code.
> 3. Converting existing collateral from docbook to a wiki. I for one
> ain't doing this by hand! :)
>
Haha there must definitely be a conversion or import process.
> I think 1 & 2 can be achieved with proper processes, we just need to
> come up with these. 3 should work with ClearSpace, will need to POC
> this though.
>
Yes we should do POC before making any changes(I am willing to invest my
time on that).
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
More information about the jbosscache-dev
mailing list