[jbosscache-dev] Re: Session Clustering for SIP
Brian Stansberry
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Thu May 22 10:32:36 EDT 2008
Jean Deruelle wrote:
> It seems that in the FieldBasedClusteredSession class, the
> setJBossInternalAttribute method (which is called by setAttribute) put
> the object in the cache and then add Obervers to check for potentials
> changes in the attributes of the object and if so set the session as
> dirty so that on transaction commit it is replicated,
>
> So I was thinking to do the same at cache level, when the put is done
> add the observers and jbosscache takes care of the changes in the object
> and replicate if needed on transaction commit. But it seems that the
> Observers can only be added on an AOPized object, so I still wonder why
> this is needed to add those observers in the FieldBasedClusteredSession
> if the object is already AOPized and not let JbossCache handle the
> replication process automatically...?
>
>
The only thing AOPized is the attribute value. The session itself
isn't. The Observer impl generates a callback to the session so it knows
it's dirty and can replicate session metadata (e.g. access timestamps,
an access counter, etc).
Note that in AS 5 I'm aiming to get rid of this Observer usage. If
changing the location where pojos is stored can work (see
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=134386) then a
simple JBC CacheListener can serve the same function. Even if not, I
may be able to get rid of it and just rely on some new stuff that
ensures the timestamp is replicated at least once a minute.
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com
More information about the jbosscache-dev
mailing list