[jbosscache-dev] Re: [hibernate-dev] cache-jbosscache3 module for Hibernate Core

Brian Stansberry brian.stansberry at redhat.com
Mon Oct 13 10:18:46 EDT 2008


Manik Surtani wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> The API of JBC 3.0 is compatible with 2.x so the actual provider code 
> should not change, but we probably want to test MVCC as a locking scheme 
> as well.
> 
> So, we either
> 
> 1)  need a cache-jbosscache3 module (yuk!), copy the providers and 
> existing tests from cache-jbosscache2 and add a few extra tests.
> 
> or,
> 
> 2)  assume that cache-jbosscache2 refers to an API and not a version of 
> the cache.  So update the cache used in cache-jbosscache2 to 3.0.0, and 
> add the extra MVCC tests as well.
> 
> My pref would be for 2, what do you guys think?
> 

Had a *quick* look at the code, and looks like the only direct use of 
the JBC node locking scheme is a check for OPTIMISTIC in the JBC config, 
which if true leads to use of classes that store versions in the cache. 
With MVCC we don't need to store versions, so looks like the existing 
logic is fine.

If the hibernate guys object to changing the dependency to 3.x, we could 
look at handling this via a maven profile. If there's no compile time 
dependency on JBC 3 in the main code or the tests (likely, since MVCC is 
configured via XML) then we could isolate execution of the MVCC tests in 
a profile.

Downside to the profile approach is the standard JBC configs that ship 
would still use PESSIMISTIC/OPTIMISTIC.

> Cheers
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik at jboss.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry at redhat.com



More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list