[jbosscache-dev] To GA or not to GA...

Jason T. Greene jason.greene at redhat.com
Tue Oct 21 19:42:50 EDT 2008


Well the good news is that it's fixed now. I just uploaded new jars.

Also, POJO Cache 2.2.0.GA is released (which uses core 2.2.0.GA).

Brian Stansberry wrote:
> No, you hadn't. I was getting worried about you.
> 
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> The test jars weren't uploaded (preventing a POJO Cache 2.2.1.GA). I 
>> suspect it was built using maven.test.skip instead of 
>> maven.test.skip.exec as before.
>>
>> Have I mentioned that maven sucks lately?
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Ok, tagged.
>>>
>>> QE should do the needful tomorrow.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20 Oct 2008, at 14:47, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was going to ping you today and request that. :-)  I just made a 
>>>> trivial housekeeping tweak to the JBoss5 profile; nothing else I want.
>>>>
>>>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>>> People,
>>>>> If everyone is happy with 2.2.1.CR2 then I propose tagging the GA 
>>>>> and passing it on to QE to release.
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Manik Surtani
>>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>>> manik at jboss.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Brian Stansberry
>>>> Lead, AS Clustering
>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>> brian.stansberry at redhat.com
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> manik at jboss.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>> jbosscache-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



More information about the jbosscache-dev mailing list