[jbossdeveloper] Maven Configuration - preferred method

[Sande Gilda]

Who does this? Is this something I should be doing? The archetypes are 
still using branch 6.2.x. Looks like we missed 6.3.x. :-(

On 09/02/2014 10:53 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
> yes. EAP Archetypes should be release together with EAP Quickstart.
>
> It already happens for WFK Archetypes..
>
> Em 9/2/14, 11:50, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Thanks Rafael. That clarifies things.
>>
>> I've always been unclear about the Archetype releases. Do they 
>> coincide with the JBoss EAP release cycle or the JBoss Developer 
>> release cycle? When do we normally tag and branch? It seems like they 
>> are tightly coupled to the quickstarts, so should we be tagging, 
>> branching, and releasing them with the quickstarts?
>>
>>
>> On 09/02/2014 10:38 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>> It was changed on this commit at 11 Feb 2014 for EAP 6.2 : 
>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commit/e9b78e807d16d8c2a6c84c36b836908e1cd86e12
>>>
>>> After that I sent several emails asking about the Archetype 
>>> productization release process and had no replies. So we haven't any 
>>> archetypes releases (but  -build-x) after that as you can see at: 
>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-archetypes/commits/6.2.x-develop
>>>
>>>
>>> Em 9/2/14, 11:25, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>> Rafael, when where the Archetypes changed? The JBoss EAP 6 Java EE 
>>>> Web Project doesn't do this in JBoss Tools 3.2.x or JBoss Developer 
>>>> Studio 7.1.GA.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/27/2014 01:29 PM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>>> We need also to consider that the actual generated project by the 
>>>>> latests Archetypes already uses <repository /> on its pom.xml.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I assume that we're already somehow encouraging them to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> More inline..
>>>>>
>>>>> Em 8/27/14, 13:26, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>>>>>>> For our products we have the obligation to keep it for 5 years, 
>>>>>>> so we already can't change the repo URL. Plus the fact that our 
>>>>>>> quickstarts are not available through the Maven Central.
>>>>>> don't know where you get 5 years from - they need to be much longer.
>>>>> You're right. If we consider the ELS of some products it can 
>>>>> easily get more than 10 years!
>>>>>> Anyway - I believe for the released runtime pom's we cnanot add 
>>>>>> the repository urls but for the quickstart examples it is okey 
>>>>>> because of the usability aspect.
>>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>