[jbossdeveloper] Maven Configuration - preferred method

[Rafael Benevides]

/s/tech/teach

Em 9/5/14, 9:59, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>
> Em 9/5/14, 9:52, Sande Gilda escreveu:
>> Hi Rafael and everyone,
>>
>> Do I need to change the 6.4.x-develop branch of the quickstarts at 
>> this point? And if so, what do I need to do?
> Idk
>>
>>   * Do I need to add the repository to all the POM files?
>>
> I'm improving QSTools to do that for us: 
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-762
>>
>>   * Should I update all the README files to mention that it is not a
>>     good practice to add the repository to the POM files?
>>
> I think so as one of the goals of the Quickstarts is to "tech" users 
> about the best practices. But  we should make it clear why we took 
> this decision so it won't be something like : "Do what We say, not 
> what We do".
>>
>>   * Should I remove the settings.xml file?
>>
> Maybe after we run QSTools to "inject" the repository into the 
> Quickstarts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sande
>>
>> On 09/05/2014 07:58 AM, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>
>>> Em 9/5/14, 8:47, Max Rydahl Andersen escreveu:
>>>> so a few things:
>>>>
>>>> in stacks.yml the id is 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' and in 
>>>> this patch it is 'jboss-products-ga-repo' but it is still using the 
>>>> techpreview url (/techpreview/all).
>>>>
>>> Since the Archtypes were released, should I update the Stacks to ` 
>>> jboss-product-repository`  for those archtypes only ? Then I update 
>>> the patch for 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' for the next EAP 
>>> 6.4 release ?
>>>> I can also see that earlyaccess is now enabled by default on 
>>>> https://github.com/jboss-developer/jboss-eap-quickstarts/commit/35847933994901f2ff29e0de20de1845f7972708 
>>>> is that expected ?
>>> I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> Anyways:
>>>>
>>>> 1) can we agree on aligning the id's ? (just so we are in sync)
>>> Yeap. For sure! I'll update the patch file now for to 
>>> 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' as I just said..
>>>>
>>>> 2) is it expected the id says 'ga' but the url is not that ?
>>>
>>> Once that we change to ' redhat-techpreview-all-repository' it won't 
>>> matter anymore.
>>>>
>>>> For #1 we should look at updating that in stacks.yml so we add it 
>>>> with the same id.
>>>>
>>>> Before changing stacks.yml I want to be sure #2 was consistent 
>>>> choice we wanted to make for that?
>>>>
>>>> ps. we actually also add this repo as a plugin repository - not 
>>>> sure if that matters for you?
>>> I don't think it matters since the tests worked fine.
>>>
>>> So that's my plan:
>>>
>>> 1 - Update the patch file to use 'redhat-techpreview-all-repository' 
>>> as repo id instead of 'jboss-products-ga-repo'. It will be available 
>>> for next EAP 6.4 Archtype release.
>>>
>>> 2 - Wait for your answer if we should update stacks.yaml  repo to ' 
>>> jboss-products-ga-repo' for EAP 6.3 Archetypes only
>>>
>>> Is that right ?
>>>>
>>>> /max 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbossdeveloper mailing list
>>> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossdeveloper/attachments/20140905/13676ef4/attachment.html