[jbossdeveloper] <repository /> on quickstarts pom.xml

[Rafael Benevides]

We also need to check that with JBDS, because it's odd that stacks only 
uses "redhat-techpreview-all-repository" as additional repository.

Max/Fred,

Is there any issues having 
https://maven.repository.redhat.com/earlyaccess/all/ as declared inside 
quickstarts pom.xml ?


Em 9/9/14, 9:27, Pete Muir escreveu:
> On 9 Sep 2014, at 13:06, Marek Novotny <mnovotny at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9.9.2014 13:56, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> On 9 Sep 2014, at 12:54, Marek Novotny <mnovotny at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9.9.2014 13:00, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>> On 9 Sep 2014, at 11:35, Marek Novotny <mnovotny at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8.9.2014 18:48, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> QSTools ticket: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-762
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But after placing http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ at the Quickstarts, I realized that we won't solve the user experience issues without adding - https://maven.repository.redhat.com// and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - http://jboss-developer.github.io/temp-maven-repo/ also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the -develop branch.
>>>>>>>>>>> I’m not sure we need to worry about people using the -develop branch. This is for contributors only, and they can read the instructions normally.
>>>>>>>>> So I assume that we need to inject http://maven.repository.redhat.com/techpreview/all/ in pom.xml and make them to add the others in settings.xml
>>>>>>> Well, we may want to add earlyaccess too. WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why we should have it there for end users? earlyaccess repository is
>>>>>> just exceptional resource for public Betas, isn't it? Isn't that
>>>>>> confusing to have it there even for traditional GA releases?
>>>>> OTOH this is not really the way Maven works. In Maven you tend to mix up all releases, and use version numbers to control what gets pulled in.
>>>> Even I agree with your statement, do we have a clean description there
>>>> what could end users understand why we have a bunch or repositories
>>>> there instead of one? We declared today that you can use our product
>>>> maven repository (online techpreview/all or offline zipped repository)
>>>> plus Central and then in Quickstarts we use "another" repository.
>>>>
>>>> I agree that injected repository will help to an end user, but wouldn't
>>>> it be simple just as one repository?
>>>>
>>>> you can easily manage versions in BOM imports etc. but for the learning
>>>> purpose it can be confusing. WDYT?
>>> Hmm. People are used to adding a second repo for snapshots, which is kinda similar.
>>>
>> What are our target group of developers for quicksktarts? Newbies or
>> experienced devs?
>>
>> I may see it more like short and simple bootstrap for newbies, but your
>> view is probably different.
> Agreed on newbies. Hence why we don’t want to make people add/remove repos, but have a sensible default configured for them.
>
>>
>> -- 
>> Marek Novotny
>> --
>> WFK and Seam Product Lead
>>
>> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
>> Purkynova 99
>> 612 45 Brno
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbossdeveloper mailing list
> jbossdeveloper at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossdeveloper