[jbosside-dev] jbosside wtp integration woes ;)

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

Why not just have an icon next to Server 1 that just signals stopped,  
starting, started, stopping ?

What is that "nifty little animation" you mention ?

/max

> Server 1
>  | -  State: Started
>  | -  Modules
>  | -  Event Log
>  | -  Descriptor XPaths
>  | -  blah blah blah
> Server 2
>  | -  State: Stopped
>  | -  Modules
>  | -  blah blah
> Server 3
>  | -  State: Starting
>  | -  et etc etc


> Clearly this isn't optimal to quickly see which servers are started or
> stopped.
>
> And finally, my server view extension API was written to accept a  
> changing
> input for the second viewer. It was not written to be a child of several
> different elements, but rather to be stand-alone elements with a changing
> input.
>
> Hopefully this gives you some insight into what was going through my tiny
> programmer mind.
>
> - Rob
>
> On 11/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen at jboss.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:09:40 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker at jboss.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Because I was told much earlier that two views is crap, one is ideal.
>> > Users
>> > dont want tons of views opened to do somethign that was previously
>> > controlled by a launch configuration.
>>
>> the two views argument i understand...so why not just have one tree ?
>>
>> I don't understand your launch configuration point is for ? We still
>> have that...
>>
>> /max
>>
>> >
>> > On 11/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen at jboss.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> #1
>> >> >> Eclipse WTP has this notion of "Adding an applicaiton" to a  
>> server.
>> >> Does
>> >> >> this also automatically
>> >> >> add source lookup to that server ?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > AFAIK no.. but this is something that might be possible to code in
>> >> > ourselves
>> >> > for our adapter (Rob would know for sure)
>> >>
>> >> If not, how do they handle the "disable breakpoints" on server  
>> feature
>> >> if
>> >> they don't somehow get info about the source ?
>> >> (look in the wtp server preferences)
>> >>
>> >> > #2
>> >> >> We have this splitted jbosserver view with what looks to me a
>> >> filtered
>> >> >> WTP
>> >> >> server view and specific jboss bottm part, correct ?
>> >> >> Why is there both a mix of jboss inc servers and jboss wtp servers
>> >> >> visible
>> >> >> in that one ?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Well IMO this should be JBoss servers only as it is the "JBoss  
>> Server
>> >> > View"
>> >> > ..
>> >>
>> >> Why not just reuse the existing WTP view and have the jboss specific
>> >> things in another view ?
>> >> (just curious)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> --
>> >> Max Rydahl Andersen
>> >> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>> >>
>> >> Hibernate
>> >> max at hibernate.org
>> >> http://hibernate.org
>> >>
>> >> JBoss a division of Red Hat
>> >> max.andersen at jboss.com
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> jbosside-dev mailing list
>> >> jbosside-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Max Rydahl Andersen
>> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>>
>> Hibernate
>> max at hibernate.org
>> http://hibernate.org
>>
>> JBoss a division of Red Hat
>> max.andersen at jboss.com
>>



-- 
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
max at hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org

JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen at jboss.com