[jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be updated

[Marshall Culpepper]

OK Koen.. I've uploaded a JAR to the repository under
eclipse/releng/jbosside-releng-tasks.jar. This includes the
CalculateFeatureDependenciesTask, and the antlib.xml is also included.

On 9/14/06, Koen Aers <koen.aers at jboss.com> wrote:
>
>  No I meant actually to CC jbosside-dev :-))
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* marshall.jboss at gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss at gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marshall Culpepper
> *Sent:* donderdag 14 september 2006 19:16
> *To:* Dev - JBoss IDE
> *Subject:* Fwd: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
> updated
>
> I think you meant to CC dev-jbosside on this one
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Koen Aers <koen.aers at jboss.com >
> Date: Sep 14, 2006 6:59 AM
> Subject: RE: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
> updated
> To: Marshall Culpepper <marshall.culpepper at jboss.com >
>
>  I am pretty much OK with doing things the way they should be done, no
> problem with that.
> Btw, are you talking about the meeting when I was in India? I cannot
> remember discussing this, but this might be due to some kind of jetlag ;-).
> Anyway, we are in the process of releasing jBPM 3.2 alpha1 so the release
> has my number one attention at present. And as I mentioned earlier, the good
> way to reuse the tag that Marshall has written would be to bundle it in a
> library that resides in the repository to avoid duplication. Or am I wrong
> about this?
>
> Regards,
> Koen
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* marshall.jboss at gmail.com [mailto:marshall.jboss at gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marshall Culpepper
> *Sent:* woensdag 13 september 2006 22:31
> *To:* Max Andersen
> *Cc:* Koen Aers; jbosside-dev at lists.jboss.org
> *Subject:* Re: [jbosside-dev] Re: jBPM Designer feature.xml needs to be
> updated
>
>  Yes, this is what we decided on our meeting.. we are moving all
> dependencies to be included the "right" way, and retrofitting the build
> system to calculate feature dependencies based on those entries, instead of
> counting on eclipse PDE to auto-bundle things that are listed as <plugin>.
>
> On 9/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen at jboss.com> wrote:
>
> > just to be clear:
> >
> > Our old/current way of bundling things are *wrong* in context of
> > integrating with the rest of
> > the eclipse ecosystem. you should only have <plugin> for plugins that is
> > actually part of the plugin
> > everything else is <import> of either plugin's or feature's.
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Marshall Culpepper
> marshall.culpepper at jboss.com
> JBossIDE Team Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
> --
> Marshall Culpepper
> marshall.culpepper at jboss.com
> JBossIDE Team Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>



-- 
Marshall Culpepper
marshall.culpepper at jboss.com
JBossIDE Team Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20060919/20200403/attachment.html