[jbosstools-dev] legacy folder weirdness!

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:18:05 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker at redhat.com> wrote:

> Legacy was intended to be things that were deprecated and no longer
> under active development, and would eventually be removed.  Both modules
> should be the same as each other right now but I will double check.  If
> they are both the same and there are no differences, I'll remove one
> ASAP.  If there are differences, I'll try to discover which one is the
> right one and remove the other.

thanks.

Why not just delete the legacy modules from trunk/svn ?

/max

> - Rob
>
>
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:57:02 +0100, Denis Golovin <dgolovin at exadel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> What is legacy component intended for?
>>>
>>
>> Something rob/marshall created a while back - I thought it was only temporary while cleaning up but seems to have stuck around.
>>
>> I think it needs to be removed but need to hear from Rob/Marshall the status.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to setup a clean tools environment today and stumbled on that we have duplicate .project's in trunk. Why is that ?
>>>>
>>>> example org.jboss.ide.eclipse.jdt.test.core exists both in legacy and in core..which one is the relevant one ?
>>>>
>>>> Alot of the others in legacy also seem duplicated...why.
>>>>
>>>> This prevents me (and other users) to simply to do an import of trunk in eclipse in more or less a single click.
>>>>
>>>> -max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/