[jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings

[Daniel Azarov]

Total file list:

wtp-usage.xml
wtp-usage.html
api-ref-compatibility.html
api-ref-compatibility.xml

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>
To: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>; "Daniel Azarov"
<daniel at exadel.com>; "Denis Golovin" <dgolovin at exadel.com>
Cc: <jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>; <external-exadel-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings


btw. what are the other files you say is generated ?

/max

>> API ScanningsI tried to make a report with JBDS GA and WTP 2.0.1 (see
attachment)
>> I can send all API scanner output files if anybody need it.
>
> Cool!
>
> I guess we need both the usage report and the report that checks for API
and non-API breakages.
>
> I created http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBDS-242, please attach the
generated files to there and i'll
> pass it along to our WTP contacts.
>
> Thanks Daniel!
> /max
>
>
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Denis Golovin
>>   To: Max Rydahl Andersen
>>   Cc: jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org ; external-exadel-list at redhat.com
>>   Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:58 PM
>>   Subject: [jbosstools-dev] Re: Fwd: [wtp-dev] API Scannings
>>
>>
>>   Alex Kazakov
>>
>>   can do it next week.
>>
>>   Denis
>>
>>   Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> I always forget this, but we should really get around sending them our
adopter report...
>>
>> Anyone up for doing that ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>> ------- Forwarded message -------
>> From: "Raev, Kaloyan" <kaloyan.raev at sap.com>
>> To: "Webtools releng discussion list" <wtp-releng at eclipse.org>, "General
discussion of project-wide or architectural issues." <wtp-dev at eclipse.org>
>> Cc:
>> Subject: [wtp-dev] API Scannings
>> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:52:17 +0100
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have resurrected the API scanning procedure. Almost all of the API
>> scanning steps run properly. I have still some troubles with the code
>> coverage part.
>>
>> I'd like to catch your attention on the Adopter Breakage Report.
>>
>> I have genereated reports for:
>>  - R2.0.1:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0.1-2007092604
>> 2742/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>>  - last M2.0.2 I-build:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.2-2007122206
>> 0852/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>>  - 3.0 M4:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-2008010509
>> 1323/
>>
>> Compared to the report for R2.0 there are lot of new adopter breakages:
>>
http://archive.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/
>> apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>> I would like also to request adopters, who have already adopted the WTP
>> 2.0.1 release, to provide updated adopter scanner reports for their
product
>> based on WTP 2.0.1. This way we can see the real delta between their last
>> adoption and the current development. How to create the report is
described
>> here:
>> http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/tool.html
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Kaloyan Raev
>> Eclipse WTP Committer
>> <http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/people/person.php?name=raev>
>> Senior Developer
>> NW C JS TOOLS JEE (BG)
>> SAP Labs Bulgaria
>> T +359/2/9157-416
>> mailto:kaloyan.raev at sap.com
>> www.sap.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>
>>
>>     Hello,
>>
>>     I have resurrected the API scanning procedure. Almost all of the API
scanning steps run properly. I have still some troubles with the code
coverage part.
>>
>>     I'd like to catch your attention on the Adopter Breakage Report.
>>
>>     I have genereated reports for:
>>       - R2.0.1:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0.1-20070926042742/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>>       - last M2.0.2 I-build:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/M-2.0.2-20071222060852/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>>       - 3.0 M4:
>>
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.0/S-3.0M4-20080105091323/
>>
>>     Compared to the report for R2.0 there are lot of new adopter
breakages:
>>
http://archive.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/apiresults/api-ref-compatibility.html
>>
>>     I would like also to request adopters, who have already adopted the
WTP 2.0.1 release, to provide updated adopter scanner reports for their
product based on WTP 2.0.1. This way we can see the real delta between their
last adoption and the current development. How to create the report is
described here:
>>
>>     http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/adopters/tool.html
>>
>>     Greetings,
>>     Kaloyan Raev
>>     Eclipse WTP Committer
>>     Senior Developer
>>     NW C JS TOOLS JEE (BG)
>>     SAP Labs Bulgaria
>>     T +359/2/9157-416
>>     mailto:kaloyan.raev at sap.com
>>     www.sap.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>   jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>   https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/