[jbosstools-dev] Re: 2.0.1 ready for verification!

[Anton Klimkovich]

Hello Max,

Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 9:04:53 AM, you wrote:

Max Rydahl Andersen> Awsome - QA, this is based
Max Rydahl Andersen> on the 2.0.x builds you have been testing until
Max Rydahl Andersen> now. Could you give a feedback ASAP on 
Max Rydahl Andersen> this build if something is
Max Rydahl Andersen> not working (e.g. any critical bug that wasn't in
Max Rydahl Andersen> 2.0.0.GA)

Max Rydahl Andersen> We want to get this one out
Max Rydahl Andersen> of the door this week.

We have verified JBossTools-2.0.1.GA-ALL-win32.zip. Verified
  all-important functionality. Any critical bugs that wasn't in 2.0.0.GA
  were not found. Verified importing all available projects created in
  JBDS 1.0.0GA. Verified using workspace with all projects that
  was created in JBDS 1.0.0GA.
-- 
Best regards,
 Anton Klimkovich   
Max Rydahl Andersen> Thanks,
Max Rydahl Andersen> /max

>> GA build is ready for testing:
>>
>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/2.0.x/2.0.1.GA/all/JBossTools-2.0.1.GA-ALL-win32.zip
>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/2.0.x/2.0.1.GA/all/JBossTools-2.0.1.GA-ALL-linux-gtk.zip
>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/2.0.x/2.0.1.GA/all/JBossTools-2.0.1.GA-ALL-macosx-carbon.zip
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 14:31 -0600, Marshall Culpepper wrote:
>>> Hey guys..
>>>
>>> Since it looks like "2.0.1" is the correct version for the incorrectly
>>> labeled plugins in JSF, I'm going to go ahead and tag and start a
>>> release build for testing. I'll post links once it's done. If the
>>> versioning needs to be rolled back to 2.1.0 for some strange reason, we
>>> can do another build.
>>>





                           mailto:aklimkovich at exadel.com