[jbosstools-dev] Re: 2.0.1 w/ updated features

[Snjezana Peco]

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> I haven't tried it on Mac, but the difference can be only in XULRunner.
>> I propose creating a xulrunner feature and putting it on SVN. This
>> feature could contain xulrunner plugins for all supported  OSes and the
>> xpcom plugin.
>> Eclipse would load a corresponding plugin based on "Platform Filter" in
>> the manifest file.
>> In this way, we would have one archive for all the OSes and wouldn't
>> depend on the ATF/Mozilla plugins.
>>     
>
> I thought that was what we had today (our own feature that depends on specific plugins where ATF
> also fetches their dependencies)
>
> We would like to be compatible with ATF, would that still be possible with having a different set
> of binaries?
>
> -max
>
>   
ATF creates its own binaries in the same way (see the ATF Web Tools 
Package). We don't have to change ATF/Mozilla plugins. We would only 
change the feature and host it on the JBoss site.

Snjeza