[jbosstools-dev] Re: physical bound file names in .settings directories ?

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

>> do we still work with non-WTP projects ? (we must)
>>
> It has not been working without  WTP natures before. Because if you add
> JSF/Struts capabilities it adds all necessary WTP features.

I'm referring to I can open files in non wtp projects and the editors almost work.
Before I assume it just ignored that there were no .settings info for it and just 
want to be sure it now does not assume it will be in an WTP project.

-max

>> What information does org.jbosstools.jst.web.xml represent ? It is more than just the jar dependencies right?
>>
>>
>>> For Struts projects dependency of Studio implementation on this file is rather strong
>>> so that eliminating it would require some extensive refactoring. Do we need to solve
>>> the problem for Struts, nevertheless, or is not it worth efforts?
>>>
>>
>> If struts is completely seperate from this then lets first focus on JSF - I haven't seen
>> anyone report back on Struts.
>>
>> -max
>>
>>
>>> Slava
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen at redhat.com>
>>> To: <jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> Cc: "Viacheslav Kabanovich" <scabanovich at exadel.com>; <external-exadel-list at redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:07 PM
>>> Subject: physical bound file names in .settings directories ?
>>>
>>>
>>> I just noticed http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137029#4137029 which
>>> asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our .settings files contains
>>> hardcoded file references.
>>>
>>> I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question.
>>>
>>> How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>