[jbosstools-dev] Solution to JBIDE-1862

[Rob Stryker]

No we shouldn't, as there's no fix to make...  Their API is fine. The 
other adapters just decide to do it differently. They just decide to do 
a full publish every time and not make use of WTP's incremental 
publishing abilities.

There's no fix to suggest to them.   But a dialog may need to be opened. 
But a dialog isn't the same as a solid "bug".  I'll need to even think 
how to approach the dialog because this wouldn't just be a server tools 
bug.  It kinda touches on about half of WTP.

It's something that I need to think about how to even bring up without 
sounding manic and all over the map.

- RS

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> so we should raise an issue with WTP on this for fix in wtp3 ?
>
> -max
>
>   
>> The generic adapter does very very weird things.
>>
>> I'm kinda [tired] ;)  So I'll just say the following:
>>
>> The other adapters don't handle sub-modules. They handle everything at
>> once always because they do not do incremental publishing. Because they
>> rebuild the .ear or .war every time, they do a full publish every time.
>>
>> SO they handle it very very differently.
>>
>> I know that doesn't help very much.
>>
>> - RS
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>     
>>>> The worst part of all is that there's no way to tell whether a "module"
>>>> is binary or is a project. There's simply no API for it.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> somehow the other adapters worked with it, correct?
>>>
>>> How do they handle the binary module ?
>>>
>>> -max
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>
>
>