[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Rob Stryker]

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins

Sergey Vasilyev wrote:
> Rob Stryker wrote:
>> Or we should have used the official releases by ATF, who *did* 
>> compile 1.8.1.3 and who released it.
> Rob, could you please provide me with a link to 1.8.1.3 x86_64 
> xulrunner plugin provided by ATF?
>
> /sergey
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized 
>>> that ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>  
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> This should be up to the VPE team to decide.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would prefer one version used across the board.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ?
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>> Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform.
>>>>
>>>> /sergey
>>>>   
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a
>>>>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases.
>>>>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 
>>>>>> 1.8.1.3
>>>>>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the 
>>>>>> update
>>>>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure 
>>>>>> this is
>>>>>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone
>>>>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the 
>>>>>> file in
>>>>>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Rob Stryker
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>     
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
>