[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Rob Stryker]

I built that one and sent it to you to verify ;)    I have the plugins 
also. Let me find it.

Sergey Vasilyev wrote:
> Rob Stryker wrote:
>> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins 
>>
> Unfortunately I do not see there 
> org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar plugin. 
> <ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar> 
>
>
> /sergey
> <ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/1.8.1.3/contrib/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_1.8.1.3-20080312.jar> 
>
>>
>> Sergey Vasilyev wrote:
>>> Rob Stryker wrote:
>>>> Or we should have used the official releases by ATF, who *did* 
>>>> compile 1.8.1.3 and who released it.
>>> Rob, could you please provide me with a link to 1.8.1.3 x86_64 
>>> xulrunner plugin provided by ATF?
>>>
>>> /sergey
>>>>
>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>> So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized 
>>>>> that ?
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> This should be up to the VPE team to decide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would prefer one version used across the board.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /sergey
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) 
>>>>>>>> use a
>>>>>>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools 
>>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the 
>>>>>>>> standard 1.8.1.3
>>>>>>>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the 
>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make 
>>>>>>>> sure this is
>>>>>>>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... 
>>>>>>>> but with
>>>>>>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone
>>>>>>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the 
>>>>>>>> file in
>>>>>>>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Rob Stryker
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>
>>
>