[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Marshall Culpepper]

Rob,

The original 64 bit build we were sent by you was 1.8.1.4. There was  
_never_ a 1.8.1.3 64 bit build until recently. When I asked at Beta1  
release time if we should use 1.8.1.3 I was told to use what we  
already had .. so it looks like we will need to either force users  
Beta1/CR1 64bit users to downgrade or stick with 1.8.1.4 for 64 bit  
and wait for ATF to upgrade to 1.8.1.4 for the rest of the binaries as  
well

On May 13, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Rob Stryker wrote:

> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/org.mozilla.xulrunner.gtk.linux.x86_64_1.8.1.3-20080508.jar
>
> I built the one at the above URL and have mailed it to philippe  
> Ombredanne <pombredanne at nexb.com>
>
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Or we should have used the official releases by ATF, who *did*  
>>> compile
>>> 1.8.1.3 and who released it.
>>>
>>
>> I thought that is what we did. They just never released a 64 bit  
>> version of it.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized  
>>>> that ?
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This should be up to the VPE team to decide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would prefer one version used across the board.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86  
>>>>> platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> /sergey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible)  
>>>>>>> use a
>>>>>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools  
>>>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the  
>>>>>>> standard 1.8.1.3
>>>>>>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the  
>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make  
>>>>>>> sure this is
>>>>>>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in...  
>>>>>>> but with
>>>>>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old,  
>>>>>>> anyone
>>>>>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the  
>>>>>>> file in
>>>>>>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Rob Stryker
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev