[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Sergey Vasilyev]

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> I was looking at these today and noticed there is about 2 meg difference between .3 and .4 - why ?
>
> /max
>
>   
>> Hi all:
>>
>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>
>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a
>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases.
>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3
>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>
>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update
>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is
>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with
>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone
>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in
>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>
>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>
>> - Rob Stryker
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>   
Which version of xulrunner did you compare? Where did you get it?

/sergey