[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

Guys,

What is the status for this 64-bit thing ?
We need to move faster ,)

Did you just randomly choose different compile options that made the distribution 2 meg different ?

What is the known differences between .3 and .4 ?

Should we just live with the small version difference ?

I can't answer these since I don't know the details of xulrunner - you guys do.

-max

> Sergey said something about tests being included.
>
> Not sure
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> I was looking at these today and noticed there is about 2 meg difference between .3 and .4 - why ?
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>> Hi all:
>>>
>>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at
>>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/
>>>
>>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a
>>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases.
>>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3
>>> used in windows, linux, and osx.
>>>
>>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update
>>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is
>>> a possibility for GA.  Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with
>>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone
>>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in
>>> the plugins folder.  Not exactly a great situation.
>>>
>>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win?
>>>
>>> - Rob Stryker
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>