[jbosstools-dev] Re: Moving to XulRunner 1.9

[Maxim Areshkau]

Rob Stryker wrote:
> Howdy ;)
>
> Any chance someone can build an x86_64 version? Otherwise I won't be
> able to use the tools I write. ;)
> I'd be glad to do any smoke tests you guys would request of me.
> Unfortunately the machine I used to try to build in the past has been
> reclaimed in my absence from NYC.
>
> I suppose I can even build it myself if one of our Russian friends
> wants to help me through the process.
>
> - Rob
>
Hi, all

Yes, I can it's not very difficult to provide x86_64 version of XR for US.
> Maxim Areshkau wrote:
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>  
>>>> We have verified work of VPE under xulrunner 1.9 for Mac, Windows
>>>> and Linux OS.
>>>>           
>>> Cool - which Linux versions ?
>>>
>>> Is xulrunner 1.9 what comes with Fedora 9/10 and Red Hat ?
>>>       
>> No, was used build from mozilla.org
>> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.9.0.7
>>  
>>>      
>>>> Almost all functionality works pretty good.
>>>>           
>>> "pretty good" - what does that mean ?
>>>     
>> It should be just good :)
>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>>      
>>>> On Mac doesn't work inIFlasher, but works DnD.
>>>>           
>>> inIFlasher is what we use to mark selection, right ?
>>>       
>> Yes, It's used for drowning blue or red border when we select element.
>>  
>>> That is way more important than DnD is it not ? i.e. without
>>> it you will not have any visual indication of where you are in the
>>> document.
>>>
>>>      
>>>> I think it's will be good to move on xulrunner 1.9 in trunk.
>>>>           
>>> I'm curious in what this will solve for us ?
>>> Do we have a jira listing what it will give ?
>>>       
>> It's much more stable, for now we should for example disable attribute
>> direction="rtl", because it's coused crash of vpe.
>> In XR 1.9 also exists additional styles (inline-table, which will be
>> usefully for us). Basically it's engine of firefox 3.0.
>> For now we have founded following issue related to XR1.8
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1719
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1536
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3353
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3969
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3993
>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-2571
>> partially https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1119
>>
>>  
>>> do we need to do all the binary builds ?
>>>       
>> We doesn't need binary build of xulrunner, just create eclipse bundles.
>> Here I describe how to do it http://jjant.com/?q=node/10
>>  
>>> Are there any updatesite avilable with 1.9 like there is for 1.8 ?
>>>       
>> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/
>>  
>>> /max
>>>       
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>   
>