[jbosstools-dev] Hudson cleanup (Attempt 2)

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

I did as Denis suggested - put a x- in front of the "dead" ones and 
updated the filter.

Shortly after I realized you can actually just sort by Last success and 
get the dead ones in the bottom automatically....

In any case now the "dead" ones are marked and I think we should do a 
quick scan at the conf call today and remove the really dead ones
since the list is still hard to grasp.

/max

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Denis Golovin wrote:
>> That's a new group and we have enough groups on hudson :) 
> I never look at the front page - I just have direct bookmarks to the 
> relevant groups...
>> Why would we just keep them the at the bottom of DevStudio group by 
>> giving them right prefix, like 'x-' or something meaningful? 
> That would probably work too - will try do that when ever I get a 
> stable connection to hudson.
>
> /max
>> Denis
>>
>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I thought I had a good hudson connection today but of course it 
>>> stopped working halfway through my "experiment" so
>>> I guess the best thing I can do is let you know up front so you 
>>> don't start screaming over "missing" builds.
>>>
>>> I went and created a "DevStudio Dormant" hudson group and started 
>>> adding "dormant-" to all builds that haven't been used for months.
>>>
>>> It worked well until hudson stopped working - when I get a working 
>>> connection again I'll continue the cleanup.
>>>
>>> Is the "Dormant" split a Good or Bad idea ? The idea is to make the 
>>> "primary" group actually list relevant builds.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev