[jbosstools-dev] For the Record
Max Rydahl Andersen
max.andersen at redhat.com
Tue Feb 24 03:54:11 EST 2009
On 24-02-2009 05:29, Rob Stryker wrote:
> The relevance is that when I was suggesting to Max to refactor much
> code into a generic WTP extenders project, rather than keeping it in
> the AS plugin, one argument to keep the code in my plugin was that my
> plugin has no dependencies and can be downloaded standalone.
>
> It can't, really. It requires JMX and archives.
>
> This means I would be more in favor of creation of some core /
> wtp-extension plugin to keep abstract or otherwise useful classes for
> our distro. Again, this would mean that AS Tools would require an
> additional download, but as we currently require archives and jmx, I
> don't think this would be an issue.
Yes, and something for after GA.
/max
>
> John Graham wrote:
>> Sorry: missing context for this...
>>
>> And so this means?
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:21 +0800, Rob Stryker wrote:
>>> max:
>>>
>>> For the record, you already cannot download standalone AS Tools
>>> without errors.
>>>
>>> It requires Archives and JMX.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list