[jbosstools-dev] More i18n questions

[Dmitry Geraskov]

Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
> Rob Stryker wrote:
>> Dmitry Geraskov wrote:
>>> Rob Stryker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You should take this into account when you parse code. User could 
>>>>>> close comment by unicode representation.
>>>>>> Eclipse colouring doesn't take it into account.
>>>>
>>>> "Should" and "could" are two very different things. lol
>>> Hm... I know... may be *can* instead of *could* is better, but it is 
>>> not your comment about.
>>> I didn't understand it.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry. What I meant was, we "can" take a user closing his comment by 
>> unicode into account, but I do not think we *should*. It sounds like 
>> a lot of work to do just to help someone who decided to close their 
>> comment with unicode.
>>
> Agree, while you should not worry about hackers and angry testers :)
I was an angry tester today (no so crazy like in the discussion, but... 
;) ) and I found some not obvious validator problems in seam wizards.
Them for example incorrectly validate method name (see New seam action 
wizard).
Enter 'method1(){ String h="Hello, from Dima";} method2 '  and validator 
will not show an error.

-- 
Best regards,

 Dmitry Geraskov              
 dgeraskov at exadel.com
 Senior Developer
 Exadel Inc