[jbosstools-dev] RFE: JDT module or put in common ?

[Fred Bricon]

Unfortunately, I don't see any other practical solution.
+1 for a new JDT module
I would add plugins / features for JBIDE-8972 under the 
org.jboss.tools.jdt.classpath namespace

my 0.02€.

Regards,

Fred Bricon

On 21/07/2011 10:47, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Snjezana have been working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8548 (easy Attach to Remote debugger)
> and Fred is about to work on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-8972  (copy classpath library to project)
> which both are things that actually should exist/be contributed to Eclipse JDT at some point.
>
> The question is where do we put them today ?
>
> Looking at existing modules putting it in common under a new plugin named org.jboss.tools.common.jdt.* is probably the best fit,
> but since common is also much more than that its not the best - its actually mostly related to xmodel than anything else - and
> I could see the interest in installing these JDT features without having to require all of xmodel and its editors extensions installed.
>
> The alternative I see is creating a new module (sigh) named jdt with org.jboss.tools.jdt.* as its base and
> we create a matching feature named "JBoss Tools JDT - Extensions for Eclipse JDT"
>
> I'm leaning to the JDT module approach, but since i'm really not a fan of adding more and more modules without
> a good reason I would like to hear if anyone has convincing arguments for or against this move ?
>
> Thanks,
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev