[jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner/VPE versioning fun

Yahor Radtsevich yradtsevich at exadel.com
Thu Jul 28 11:26:38 EDT 2011


Did not notice your mail, Nick.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nick Boldt <nboldt at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 07/28/2011 07:41 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> >> The xulrunner have some weird versioning I would like to get cleaned up
> or at least documented why it is so:
> >>
> >> The bundle manifests uses three different versions:
> >>
> >> Bundle-Version: 1.9.2.16
> >> this is original XR binaries
> >> Bundle-Version: 1.9.2.16b
> >> this is slightly changed original binaries for Windows and Linux x86. I
> have added 'b' while modifying these plugins.
> >> Bundle-Version: 1.9.2.19pre
> >> this is binaries from XR nightly builds for Linux x86_64, it works the
> best on Linux x86_64
> >
> >> The feature uses a "merged" version in 2 different shapes:
> >>
> >> /features/org.mozilla.xpcom.feature/feature.xml:
>  version="1.9.216.qualifier"
> >> ./features/org.mozilla.xulrunner.feature/feature.xml:
>  version="1.9.218.qualifier"
> >> 218 should be just a typo. Probably we it would be better if we leave
> 1.9.2.qualifier
>
>  > eh ? no �why not 1.9.2.18.qualifier ? hmm i guess osgi doesn't like
> that.
>
> No, leave .216 and/or .218 so we know that it aligns with included
> plugin versions. And yes, we can't have a 5-part version under osgi
> rules, which is why I started using this a.b.cd.qualifier feature
> version for a.b.c.d plugins.
>
OK

>
> Reverting to .2 would be bad -- must go forward, not backward.
>
> "If it ain't broke..." :)
>
> > Any how - we need to be careful about such changes since might not be
> possible to install via p2 if sudden change in sequence of version number.
> >
> >>
> >> Questions for Yahor/Denis:
> >>
> >> 1) Does these ever change ? if yes then they should have .qualifiers in
> the manifest
> >> Yes, Denis and I are trying to keep it updated.
> >
> > So what part of the version number do you bump on changes ?
> >
> >> 2) Any reason why a mix of .16/.16b/.19pre and 216/218 ?
> >> Yes, see above. Different OSs need different XR versions. I will add
> comments to poms.
> >
> > ok. thanks.
> >
> > /max
> >
> >>
> >> /max
> >> http://about.me/maxandersen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> >> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
> >>
> >> --Yahor
> >
> > /max
> > http://about.me/maxandersen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jbosstools-dev mailing list
> > jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
> http://nick.divbyzero.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20110728/7fdd400f/attachment.html 


More information about the jbosstools-dev mailing list