[jbosstools-dev] JBoss Maven Integration Facet?
Max Rydahl Andersen
max.andersen at redhat.com
Fri Sep 23 07:00:58 EDT 2011
>>>> to be deployed to AS using the existing WTP support. The facets I'm
>>>> using are:
>>>> * Java
>>>> * Utility Module
>>> Sounds about right yes.
>>>
>>> For the case of importing existing maven projects and have these
>>> things enabled Fred Bricon should be able to tell you what the
>>> m2e/wtp plugin needs to identify them.
>> Indeed, to be deployed by WTP as a simple jar (in a war or ear), most
>> projects need the Utility facet (and the Java one).
>> However, if your projects need a special treatment for packaging (ex.
>> sar projects can embed other libs) or need to be deployed standalone
>> (not in ear nor war)
>>
>> Then one should :
>> - create a dedicated facet
>> - modify the server adapters to allow standalone deployment of these
>> new modules (that's what Rob did for the new SAR support)
>>
>> Of course creating a dedicated facet can also be useful just in terms
>> of tooling support (if you plan to create project wizards, eclipse
>> builders …)
Yes, a Facet will be good for the most smooth integration - it should just be marked as compatible with War and Jar packaging then.
>>
>> Anyway, as long as you use plain old jar
> ... using the Utility facet should be enough.
Yes, I hope SwitchYard can just survive with that since it also means it gets possible to bundle it in a war, ear etc. "for free"
if switchyard needs its own packaging things gets very much tied down.
/max
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list