[jbosstools-dev] Eclipse Juno testing

[Dmitry Geraskov]

What are the plans to make commits for Eclipse Juno possible? Are we 
going to have a branch for it or will migrate trunk soon?

I had a lot of changes as usual in JPT plugins.

Dmitry

14.04.2012 18:51, Nick Boldt wrote:
> (2012-04-13 13:32:29) ldimaggi_: nboldt, bfitzpat stupid question - Juno
> is 4.2 - what's 3.8?
> (2012-04-13 13:32:43) bfitzpat: also Juno
> (2012-04-13 13:33:02) bfitzpat: 3.8 and 4.2 are both Juno, but 4.2 is
> the main version and 3.8 is the 3.x stream version
> (2012-04-13 13:34:10) bfitzpat: 3.x is on its way out eventually
> (2012-04-13 13:34:44) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, got it - so - we need to
> test.............both - and 3.7 to I think   ;-)
> 13:35
> (2012-04-13 13:35:16) bfitzpat: yeah, well... we don't really have a 4.2
> ready build yet so far as I know
> (2012-04-13 13:35:26) bfitzpat: though Nick is pushing to test some
> early stuff
> (2012-04-13 13:36:23) ldimaggi_: bfitzpat, that's why I asked   ;-)
>
> --
>
> Since 4.2 is already at M6 [1], the window of opportunity to discover
> what (if anything) in JBDS won't run on it is nearly closed. After M7
> (Star Wars Day*) only hold-the-presses, stop-ship issues will be
> CONSIDERED, much less fixed.
>
> Sure, we can report issues against upstream later on and they'll get
> fixed (maybe) in SR1 (September 2012) or SR2 (February 2013) but
> ideally, JBDS 5 would run OOTB on Eclipse 4.2/3.8 as well as 3.7,
> without our needing to patch stuff in Eclipse or WTP (like we have had
> to do in past years, particularly re: SWT or equinox). Ideally, we'd be
> able to have the same JBDS 5 bits working on BOTH Eclipse 3.7.2 and 4.2/3.8.
>
> So, to that end, we need to start testing builds [2] and installs of
> JBDS 5 on the new Juno platform as well as the existing Indigo one.
>
> [1]
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Juno/Simultaneous_Release_Plan#Milestones_and_Release_Candidates
>
> [2]
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016#comment-12684016
>
> --
>
> As to the question of 3.8 vs. 4.2, 3.x is the old stream which is being
> (eventually) phased out. 4.2 includes a compatibility layer so that in
> theory anything 3.x-dependent can run on 4.2 as well. The TP I built
> includes the 4.2 bits (which in turn include much of the 3.8 site too).
> My fond hope is that I won't need to include any additional 3.8-level
> plugins beyond what's already in the Juno or Eclipse 4.2 sites.
>
> --
>
> More info&  links: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>
>