[jbosstools-dev] Time to start using, testing, and building JBT & JBDS against Juno!

[Nick Boldt]

Where are you seeing this?

On 04/16/2012 09:00 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> looks like we are back to ODT disturbing us in Juno too ?!
>
> org.apache.maven.InternalErrorException: Internal error: java.lang.RuntimeException: "No solution found because the problem is unsatisfiable.": ["Unable to satisfy dependency from org.apache.jasper 7.0.21.v201203080607 to bundle org.apache.catalina [7.0.21,7.0.22).", "Unable to satisfy dependency from org.apache.tomcat.util 7.0.21.v201203080607 to bundle org.apache.catalina [7.0.21,7.0.22).", "Unable to satisfy dependency from org.eclipse.jdt.core 3.7.1.v_OTDT_r201_201109101025 to org.eclipse.objectteams.otdt.core.patch.feature.group [2.0.0,3.0.0).", "No solution found because the problem is unsatisfiable."]
>
> /max
>
> On Apr 16, 2012, at 14:50 , Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Way ahead of you.
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469?focusedCommentId=12684016&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12684016
>>
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11547
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11546
>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11545
>>
>> Just wanted to know if we needed that for the components that aren't in our SVN tree (namely, SOA Tooling).
>>
>> On 04/15/2012 04:59 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>> Why not just do what we do for the CI build ?
>>>
>>> it builds the full source tree without tests as far as I remember ?
>>>
>>> That will reveal any compilation problems without having to create 40+ new jobs ?
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 18:55 , Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>
>>>> New Juno M6-based target platforms are available for use w/ your local builds.
>>>>
>>>> Do we need to have 40+ new jobs created to run the various components against these TPs, or can people take it upon themselves to try this effort locally?
>>>>
>>>> Here's all you need to do to test the TP and see if your bits work w/ the new Eclipse version:
>>>>
>>>> a) download new TP zip [1]. Unpack on disk.
>>>>
>>>> b) mvn clean install ... -Plocal.site -Dlocal.site=file:///path/to/juno.M6/target-platform/
>>>>
>>>> If you prefer to use the remote repo, override the default Indigo SR2 site with this:
>>>>
>>>> -Djbosstools-target-site=http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.juno.M6/latest/
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/target-platform_3.3.juno.M6/
>>>>
>>>> On 04/11/2012 03:39 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>> As Juno is scheduled to be released this June, and is already on its M6
>>>>> milestone, it's time to start trying it out to find out what will break
>>>>> in JBoss Tools / Dev Studio when installed into or built against Juno,
>>>>> so we can either report issue upstream to eclipse.org, or fix them in
>>>>> our code so we can run on both 3.7 and 4.2/3.8.
>>>>>
>>>>> We now have a Juno Composite Requirements Site which you can use for
>>>>> building/testing against the latest Juno M6 milestone (Eclipse 4.2 / 3.8).
>>>>>
>>>>> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/juno/
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be producing 2 new jobs shortly to generate Target Platforms (one
>>>>> for JT, one for JBDS) using these bits instead of the Indigo SR2 ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments? Please post thoughts to
>>>>> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11469
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools&   Dev Studio
>>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools&  Dev Studio
>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>

-- 
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com