[jbosstools-dev] JBoss Tools 4 / JBDS 6 :: M1 will now be called Alpha1
Denis Golovin
dgolovin at exadel.com
Thu Aug 30 12:19:30 EDT 2012
+1 for the second option. With this approach build from branch would
never be picked up for trunk build or trunk update.
On 08/30/2012 08:30 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Yes, but the conflict here is that Max wants the qualifier to start
> with the name (M1, Alpha1), not a timestamp (as we did for JBoss Tools
> 3.3 / JBDS 5). This is to avoid being able to incorrectly "upgrade"
> from M2 to M1 should the timestamp of the M2 build be older than the M1.
>
> --
>
> To allow OSGi ASCII ordering it's either (NOTE: dates are hypothetical):
>
> 4.0.0.20120830-M1
> 4.0.0.20120930-M2
> 4.0.0.Beta1-20121030
> 4.0.0.CR1-20121115
> 4.0.0.Final-20121130
>
> or
>
> 4.0.0.Alpha1-20120830
> 4.0.0.Alpha2-20120930
> 4.0.0.Beta1-20121030
> 4.0.0.CR1-20121115
> 4.0.0.Final-20121130
>
> Personally, I prefer the symmetry of the second option.
>
> Note too that 0-9 < A-Z < a-z, so if we move forward w/ Alpha1, users
> would have to uninstall that early build to upgrade to features with a
> timestamp-Mx qualifier, as 2012 < Alpha1.
>
> N
>
>
> On 08/30/2012 11:14 AM, Rodney Russ wrote:
>> milestone releases are supported by those rules of versioning:
>>
>> "That brings us to case number two, which is projects that chose to
>> use milestone releases, instead of the more traditional alpha, beta,
>> ..."
>>
>> ----- "Nick Boldt" <nboldt at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In order to:
>>>
>>> a) adhere to the official jboss.org rules for versioning [1] and
>>>
>>> b) to avoid causing anyone who's installed an early milestone (eg.,
>>> 4.0.0.M2) to have to first UNINSTALL before being able to update to
>>> our
>>> 4.0.0.Beta1 release Eclipse,
>>>
>>> we've renamed the first milestone, M1, to Alpha1.
>>>
>>> This allows us to move through the OSGi ASCII sequence Alpha, Beta,
>>> CR,
>>> Final, and GA, with each more stable milestone able to act as an
>>> update
>>> for the previous.
>>>
>>> * JIRA targets in JBIDE and JBDS have been renamed. Your issues will
>>> move automatically to the new version targets. Please update your
>>> queries.
>>>
>>> * JBoss Tools' parent pom is now 4.0.0.Alpha1 instead of 4.0.0.M1.
>>> I've
>>> updated all the components' root poms in both JBT and JBDS SVN trees
>>> to
>>> use the newly versioned parent pom, and published the new pom to
>>> nexus.
>>>
>>> See also JBDS-1987 and JBDS-2251.
>>>
>>> [1] https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
>>> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
>>> http://nick.divbyzero.com
>
More information about the jbosstools-dev
mailing list