[jbosstools-dev] jboss-nightly profiles

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

Not sure why parent pom have this change committed yet. Cleanup is still ongoing ;(

Anyways, SOA tools would be an *additional* site to add, right? not an Either-or in the current nor future setup afaics from a build perspective.

/max

On 15 Nov 2012, at 08:57, Andrej Podhradsky <apodhrad at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> 
> I noticed your change in parent pom
> 
> 		<profile>
> 			<id>jbosstools-nightly-staging-composite-soa-tooling</id>
> 			<properties>
> 				<!-- TODO: This SOA profile should be based on usage of a SOA-specific TP made of unified + JBT -->
> -				<jbosstools-site>${jbosstools-nightly-staging-composite}</jbosstools-site>
> -				<jbosstools-tests-site>${jbosstools-nightly-staging-composite-soa-tooling}</jbosstools-tests-site>
> +				<jbosstools-site>${jbosstools-nightly-staging-composite-soa-tooling}</jbosstools-site>
> +				<jbosstools-tests-site>${jbosstools-nightly-soa-tooling-tests}</jbosstools-tests-site>
> 			</properties>
> 		</profile>
> 
> Yesterday me and Mickael discussed about this ;-) the impossibility of setting two repositories (core + soa) using nightly profiles.
> As I got to know, there will be a soa specific target platform (when?) so it was a temporary solution. For me it is no problem to specify
> the repo from command line but having this resolved in pom is always better. 
> Just wondering from where is build http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/nightly/soatests/trunk?
> 
> Have a nice day!
> 
> -- 
> Andrej Podhradsky 
> Quality Assurance Associate 
> JBoss SOA Platform 
> IRC: apodhrad at #jbossqa #jbosssoa #jbosssoaqa #devstudio-qa #brno 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev