[jbosstools-dev] Test failures/timeout are very bad

[Victor Rubezhny]

Denis, what JDK are used in your environment?

I have the same problems with (Sun) Oracle JDK 1.7. Set it up instead of 
(Sun) Oracle JDK 1.6 while trying to reproduce 
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-14515. Didn't have any timeouts 
when JDK 1.6 was used.

Victor

On 05/23/2013 10:58 PM, Denis Golovin wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 06:19 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
>> On 05/23/2013 03:16 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>> OK, so the net of this conversation is that the Base job should be 
>>> switched back to using Xvnc instead of Xvfb? Should we do the same 
>>> for all the other jobs, or flip them over on a case-by-case basis, 
>>> only as required?
>> Xvnc makes (often) some error_code 13
>> Xvfb seems to slow down some tests...
>>
>> I've merged the PR to disable the workbench autosave job. Let's hope 
>> it's enough for test to run on Xvfb...
> That didn't work for me in hibernate build, no more Workspace Auto 
> Save Job, but Display.sleep() still called in waitForJobs() method and 
> did not return control back when xvbf used.
>
> Denis
>> -- 
>> Mickael Istria
>> Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
>> My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets 
>> <http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20130523/18c16c18/attachment.html