[jbosstools-dev] ACTION REQUIRED: Tagging of jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1

[Alexey Kazakov]

jbosstools-jst has not Beta1x branch. But it has changed since 4.1.0 
(Alpha1, Alpha2).
And we pushed some stuff to 4.1.x for CR1.
Should we tag Alpha2 as Beta1 then?


On 11/11/2013 02:09 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
> No need to retag xulrunner since we haven't rebuilt it since 4.1.0. No
> new code since last release == no need to tag. All other components have
> changed since 4.1.0 so they'll be tagging for Beta1, branching for CR1
> and tagging for .Final (once we get there).
>
> On 11/11/2013 02:16 PM, Yahor wrote:
>> Do we need to create tags in not changed components (i.e. xulrunner)?
>>
>> On the one hand it will be easier to build a particular version of the
>> JBoss Tools in the future.
>> On the other hand we did not even create the "jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1x"
>> branch and did not rebuild xulrunner since jbosstools-4.1.0.Final.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen
>> <manderse at redhat.com <mailto:manderse at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      Nick added this add the end of the announce mail, marking it as
>>      ACTION required to let you all know.
>>       >
>>       >Project leads, please tag your projects!
>>       >
>>       >   co jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1x
>>       >   git tag jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1
>>       >   git push origin jbosstools-4.1.1.Beta1
>>
>>      Note: Really would be nice if jenkins could just make such tags in
>>      its own repository and
>>      we could move the exact commit over from the "build" repository to
>>      the master repository.
>>
>>      /max
>>
>>      _______________________________________________
>>      jbosstools-dev mailing list
>>      jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>      https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>>
>>