[jbosstools-dev] Version bumps for JBT 4.1.1 / JBT 4.2

[Nick Boldt]

/me forwards this to the other list as requested


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Version bumps for JBT 7.1.0 / JBDS 8.0.0
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:04:34 +0200
From: Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse at redhat.com>
To: Alexey Kazakov <akazakov at exadel.com>
CC: Nick Boldt <nboldt at redhat.com>, external-exadel-list at redhat.com

btw. please use jbosstools-dev for tech stuff like this - not 
external-exadel-list.

/max

On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:03:09PM -0700, Alexey Kazakov wrote:
>OK, I got it.
>We have changed CDI and JSF in 4.1.x since 4.1.0.Final. And we have
>bumped CDI version (1.5.0->1.5.1) and JSF (3.5.0->3.5.1).
>Seam has not changed since 4.1.0.Final (no code changes, no version
>bumping) because we thought we should not bump unchanged components.
>OK. It's not correct anymore (if it ever was) and we should bump the
>unchanged seam component for 4.1.1.Beta1 too (3.5.0->3.5.1) because we
>have changed and bumped CDI and JSF which are parts of the same github
>repo.
>I will fix it for Beta1 for seam.
>
>
>On 10/04/2013 11:33 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>Yes, that was the suggestion from Max yesterday.
>>
>>He seems to want to treat entire github repos as single entities
>>when dealing with version bumps.
>>
>>So, if ANY of the subcomponents in a repo change, ALL the
>>subcomponents should increment their .y or .z digit accordingly.
>>
>>In the attachments on this thread, I've assumed that the reason
>>nothing was bumped is because nothing had changed, so that bumping
>>from 3.5.0 to 3.5.1 and 3.5.100 was reasonable.
>>
>>If in fact something DID change, or WILL change before GA of JBDS
>>7.1 or 8.0, then perhaps 3.6.0 is a better version to use. The
>>amount of change determines which version makes more sense, and of
>>course you'll know that more than I will since you're committing the
>>changes.
>>
>>
>>On 10/04/2013 02:15 PM, Alexey Kazakov wrote:
>>>So if we have bumped javaee (because of changes in cdi and jsf) we
>>>should bump seam too even if it doesn't have any changes, correct?
>>>
>>>On 10/04/2013 11:10 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>>>Max,
>>>>
>>>>I took a look a copy of the latest versionwatch report, dumped it into
>>>>OpenOffice Calc, and cleaned out all the places where features &
>>>>versions WERE incremented.
>>>>
>>>>What's left is a list of plugins and features in JBDS 7.x (4.1.x
>>>>branch) and 8.0 (master branch) where it appears that some things
>>>>haven't been correctly upversioned.
>>>>
>>>>Worst offender is org.jboss.tools.vpe, where master branch is 3.5.0
>>>>but 4.1.x branch is 3.5.1. Other IUs listed should move up too since
>>>>their parent projects have bumped (ie., if anything in Base has
>>>>bumped, so too should runtime and usage; if part of JavaEE has bumped,
>>>>so too should Seam).
>>>>
>>>>See attached screenshot and .ods spreadsheet. I haven't opened JIRAs
>>>>for these issues yet - wanted your +1 on them first.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: version-bumps.png
Type: image/png
Size: 93171 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbosstools-dev/attachments/20131007/b54a8ff5/attachment-0001.png